In the composed request that was made accessible later, the judge decided that looking for redressal of one’s complaints through methodology set up by law is the sign of any cultivated society. “The courts of this nation can’t stand to unfavorably segregate any convict, including death row convict, in quest for his legitimate cures, by turning a Nelson’s eye towards him” the judge underscored. Only 12 hours before the four men who assaulted a 23-year-old in 2012 were to be directed to the scaffold at Tihar, a Delhi court on Friday remained the dark warrant for their execution. This was the second time that their execution was put off by the judge. This time, the judge didn’t give a new warrant for their execution.
A few hours sooner, Judge Dharmender Rana had heard the attorney of the convicts look for abrogation of the execution orders since the four were yet to deplete their lawful alternatives. One benevolence request is as yet pending before the President. The convict’s attorney had refered to the jail manual which says that for a situation where more than one individual has been given over capital punishment, the execution can’t occur except if every one of the convicts have depleted their legitimate choices. A short while after 5 pm, the judge rose up out of his chambers to convey his one-line decision. “Execution Order Stayed Till Further Orders,” he said. The four convicts – Mukesh Kumar Singh (32), Pawan Gupta (25), Vinay Kumar Sharma (26) and Akshay Kumar Singh (31) – were condemned to death by a most optimized